|
Bridge Loans
refer to short-term
borrowings that fund a company's operations for a fixed period of
time. The purpose of most bridge loans is to provide a company with
funds to continue operation until longer-term financing can be
secured. That funding may come in the form of a loan, the sale of
company securities, or receipt of a large payment. The need for a
bridge loan can arise when a company runs out of cash before it
succeeds in obtaining more capital investment through an offering of
long-term debt or equity. Existing investors frequently provide the
funding for bridge loans.
The short-term nature of a bridge loan
creates pressure to complete the long-term financing package within
the bridge loan term. Failure to find replacement funding within the
term can result in penalties. Depending on the conditions in the
bridge loan agreement, a default can give the lender substantial
rights to company assets or additional influence over management.
Negotiating an extension to a bridge loan agreement can be costly.
If the bridge loan came with options granted to the lender,
additional options may be required or the cost of the loan my
increase. By the same token, management's eagerness to liquidate a
bridge loan by finding replacement financing can cause it to
conceded points in the permanent financing it would not otherwise
concede.
The most important terms to consider
when negotiating a bridge loan include the following:
-
Term.
The longer the term is the better. In any event, the term should
be long enough to give management a reasonable opportunity to
find and close a long term funding to replace the bridge loan.
-
Interim Payments.
From management’s perspective, a loan without interim payments
is preferable.
-
Interest Rate.
The cost of the loan should always be considered carefully. If
options or warrants are granted to the bridge lender with the
loan, the value of those options or warrants should be included
in the cost.
-
Conversion.
Will the lender agree to convert its bridge loan into the
security sold in the permanent financing that replaces it? A
conversion commitment can make it easier to find replacement
funding because it demonstrates the bridge lender’s long-term
commitment to the company.
-
Security.
Is the loan secured by company assets or stock? While less
protective of the investor, an unsecured loan would be
preferable to management and easier to document and complete.
When accepting bridge financing,
management should be careful to understand the consequences if the
long-term financing does not come through on time. It helps to
negotiate as long a term as possible on a bridge loan and to borrow
enough money to carry the company through the loan's term. If the
bridge financing is with an outside investor, management should
explore the possibility of converting it into longer-term financing
if the need arises, even if the terms of converting the bridge are
less favorable than the anticipated terms of the "take-out"
financing.
See: Financing Agreements,
Investment Memorandums, Letters of Intent, Leverage, Negotiation. |
|